This adds group ids to the `Sample Nearest Surface` node. This allows e.g. finding
the closest point on a specific mesh island.
Three new sockets are added:
* `Group ID`: Is evaluated on the face domain and splits the input mesh into multiple
parts, each with its own id.
* `Sample Group ID`: Determines in which group the closest nearest surface is detected.
* `Is Valid`: Outputs true if a nearest surface was found, it's false if the group is empty.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/118150
In this commit, a temporary mesh is created representing the edit mesh.
This mesh is then used in the Edit Mesh snapping system instead of the
BMesh.
By using a Mesh object for snapping, we remove a considerable amount of
code and use a more optimized version of snapping.
This simplifies the code and makes it easier to implement new features.
## Performance test: Face + Edge + Vert
| | Cache | Gen. Snap |
|--------|-----------|-----------|
| Before | 680.88 ms | 0.1250 ms |
| After | 489.06 ms | 0.1064 ms |
| Improv | 28.65% | 14.88% |
## Performance test: Face
| | Cache | Gen. Snap |
|--------|-----------|-----------|
| Before | 293.90 ms | 0.0230 ms |
| After | 411.92 ms | 0.0256 ms |
| Improv | -40.15% | -11.30% |
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/117047
Make the naming consistent with the recent change from "loop" to
"corner". Avoid the need for a special type for these triangles by
conveying the semantics in the naming instead.
- `looptris` -> `corner_tris`
- `lt` -> `tri` (or `corner_tri` when there is less context)
- `looptri_index` -> `tri_index` (or `corner_tri_index`)
- `lt->tri[0]` -> `tri[0]`
- `Span<MLoopTri>` -> `Span<int3>`
- `looptri_faces` -> `tri_faces` (or `corner_tri_faces`)
If we followed the naming pattern of "corner_verts" and "edge_verts"
exactly, we'd probably use "tri_corners" instead. But that sounds much
worse and less intuitive to me.
I've found that by using standard vector types for this sort of data,
the commonalities with other areas become much clearer, and code ends
up being naturally more data oriented. Besides that, the consistency
is nice, and we get to mostly remove use of `DNA_meshdata_types.h`.
Pull Request: https://projects.blender.org/blender/blender/pulls/116238
The term `looptri` was used ambiguously for both single & arrays.
The term `tri` was also used, causing `tri->tri`.
Use terms:
- `looptris` for an array or when dealing with multiple items.
- `looptri` is used when dealing with a single item.
- `lt` for a single MLoopTri variables & arguments.
This was already a convention but not followed closely.
Hans Goudey
Jacques Lucke
Germano Cavalcante
Campbell Barton
Hans Goudey